Παρασκευή, 9 Απριλίου 2010

ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΒΑΣΙΛΙΑ ΗΛΙΟ


στις φωτιές του Ιούλη αναστήθηκα
μπαινοβγαίνω στη Γη
σέρνω τον Ήλιο πάνω στο άρμα του.
Σε λαμπρή τελετή
σέρνω χορό κι ανεμίζω το θαύμα του.

Στην καρδιά της φωτιάς η εικόνα μου
κάθε σπίθα του ιδρώτα σταγόνα μου
έχω όψεις πολλές
χίλιες φυλές για Θεό με πιστέψανε
σε γιορτές λαμπερές
πολλοί λαοί με φωτιές με λατρέψανε.

Μια πατρίδα στον κόσμο μου έμεινε
μια γιορτή μες στο χρόνο μου επέζησε
μασκαράδες με προβιές
μου ανάβουνε φωτιές
καιν στεφάνια στρογγυλά,
τα τσουλάν απ' την πλαγιά
Παρασύρομαι κι εγώ
μες στον ξέφρενο χορό
στον ανθρώπων τις φωνές
που πηδάνε τις φωτιές

Μπαινοβγαίνω στη Γη
σέρνω τον Ήλιο πάνω στο άρμα του.
Σε λαμπρή τελετή
σέρνω χορό κι ανεμίζω το θαύμα του.
έχω όψεις πολλές
χίλιες φυλές για Θεό με λατρέψανε.
Σε γιορτές λαμπερές
πολλοί λαοί με φωτιές με λατρέψανε.

ξεκινω το αρθρο με αυτο τον υπεροχο τραγουδι που εκφραζει στους στοιχους του ολη τη μεγαλοπρεπια του αιωνιου παναρχαιου ανικητου ηλιου


ο ηλιος λατρευτικε απο τους θρησκευομενους ανθρωπους απο την αρχη της ιστοριας του ανθρωπινου γενους η θρησκεια του ηλιου ειναι παναρχαια περιπου 10.000 ετων στη διαρκεια αυτων των ετων ο ηλιος λατρευτικε απο παρα πολλους λαους αναμεσα τους και τους ελληνες

αλλα ας παμε στα περι συμβολισμου του ηλιου ο ηλιος ηταν ο θεος του νομου και της ταξης και η φιλοσοφια του ειχε σκοπο μια καλυτερη κοινονια αυτος ηταν ο λογος που εγινε ιδιετερα αγαπητος στη ρωμαικη κοινωνια γιατι ταυτιστικε πληρως με τις ρωμαικες αρετες πειθαρχεια ταξη και τιμη

για να λεμε ομως την ιστορικη αληθεια ο θεος αυτος ηλθε στους ρωμαιους απο τους περσες στο πλαισιο της ανταλαγης πολιτισμων κατα τη διαρκεια της ρωμαιο-περσικης επαφης και στην αρχη δεν ηταν επισημη


επισημη εγινε αργοτερα απο τον αυτοκρατορα και στοικο φιλοσοφο μαρκο αυριλιο ο οποιος εχτισε τον πρωτο ναο του ηλιου στη ρωμη μαζι με ενα βομο με αφιερωση "to soli invicto" απο τοτε η λατρεια του ηλιου εγινε επισημη σε ολη τη ρωμαικη αυτοκρατορια αλλα δεν λατρευτικε τοσο στη δυση οσο στην ανατολη τον "οικο του ηλιου" οπως την ονομαζει ο ιουλιανος στο ημερολογιο του

μια απο τις μεγαλυτερες μορφες της ηλιολατρειας ηταν ο μαξιμος ο εφεσιος ιεροφαντης και φιλοσοφος ο οποιος και μυησε τον ιουλιανο στα μεγιστα ηλιολατρικα μυστυρια στην νικομηδεια οπου γνωριστηκαν και του διδαξε σχετικα με τη συγκεκριμενη πιστη o μαξιμος υπηρξε μια απο τις μεγαλυτερες μορφες της ηλιολατρειας διδαξε τον ιουλιανο μεχρι το τελος της ζωης του και μερικα χρονια αργοτερα πεθανε και ο ιδιος μαρτυρικα με αποκεφαλισμο στο ναο της εφεσου επειδη εξασκουσε τη μαντικη τεχνη με ερωτημα την ημερομηνια του θανατου του αυτοκρατορα ουλιεντα
ο ιεροφαντης μαξιμος(διακρινετε πισω απο τον αυτοκρατορα ιουλιανο συνοδευομενος απο φρουρους και τον επισης ιεροφαντη πρισκο)στον παραπανω πινακα


η φιλοσοφια της ηλιολατρειας δεν εσβησε με το θανατο της παγανιστικης λατρειας αλλα περασε και στη χριστιανικη πιστη(απο τον κωσταντινο ακομη)μεσω της ιστοριας του μεσσια ιησου χριστου




HΛΙΟΛΑΤΡΕΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΕΛΛΑΣ


αν και η λατρεια του ηλιου δεν ηταν ταυτισμενη με τους ελληνες εν τουτης υπηρχαν ελληνες που ειχαν τη λατρεια του ηλιου μεσα στην καθημερινοτητα τους πρωτοι απο ολους εφεραν την λατρεια του ηλιου εν ελλαδι οι κρητες ενα καθαρα ελληνικο φυλο που ηταν μαλιστα ενα απο τα πρωτα εις τον ελληνικο χωρο μεσα σε πολλες θεοτητες οι κρητικοι τιμουσαν και το θεο ηλιο με εξερετικη μεγαλοπρεπεια στα γνωστα ηλιοστασια οπου γινωνταν θυσιες και τελετουργικα

ενα αλλο καθαρα ελληνικο φυλο που λατρευε τον ηλιο ηταν οι μακεδονες αλλα εδω για τους τυπους λατρειας και τα τελετουργικα δεν εχω πληροφοριες

επισης οι ελληνες της ανατολης(εφεσος νικομηδεια κιλυκια κτλ)ηταν οι καθαρα ηλιολατρες που λατρευαν τον ηλιο επισημα μαζι με τους θεους της μητερας πατριδος

Πέμπτη, 8 Απριλίου 2010

ΠΕΡΙ ΑΡΥΑΣ ΙΔΕΟΛΟΓΙΑΣ


αν και το εν λογο αρθρο δεν κολαει με τους σκοπους του εν λογο blog να κανει τον κοσμο να γνωρισει σχετικα με την πατρωα θρησκεια και τους μεγαλους ανδρες και γυναικες που την τιμησαν αποφασισα να γραψω αυτο το αρθρο προς αποκαταστασης της ιστορικης αληθειας περι αυτης της ιδεολογιας.

κατα πρωτον πολυ θεωρουν οτι η αρυα ιδεολογια ειναι ναζιστικη ΛΑΘΟΣ!
αυτη η version ειναι παραποιημενη απο πολλες αποψεις καταρχας ο αρυανισμος δεν εχει να κανει με την ανωτεροτητα του δερματος η μιας συγκεκριμενης φυλης εχει να κανει καθαρα με φιλοσοφικη και πολιτισμικη ανωτεροτητα(καθως αυτα ειναι τα οπλα του αρυου μυαλο και καρδια)

οχι η βιαιη καταστολη και αφαιρεση των ελευθεριων που εκαναν οι ναζι για να κρυψουν την αδυναμια τους εναντι των αλλων

η πραγματικη ριζα της αρυας ιδεολογιας λοιπον ειναι παναρχαια και δεν ξεκινα απο τη γερμανια αλλα απο την περσια(το σημερινο ιραν iran=land of aryans) αυτη ειναι η πραγματικη πατριδα του καθε αρυου(μαζι βεβαιος με τη χωρα του και το εθνος του)

ο πραγματικος αρυος λοιπον αγαπα και σεβετε τη χωρα του και το ιραν(καθως οπως προειπα αυτη ειναι η πατριδα του καθε αρυου) ειναι μαχητης της ελευθεριας και προστατευει τους αθωους


αλλο χρεος του αρυου ειναι να αγαπα την τεχνη και την κουλτουρα της χωρας του(οχι να τη χρησιμοποιει ως προπαγανδα εναντι των αλλων)




η περσια ειναι μια χωρα με μεγαλη ιστορια ηταν η πρωτη χωρα που αντιμετωπισε τον αντρα και την γυναικα ως ισους και η πρωτη που εδωσε τα ανθρωπινα δικαιωματα


ο κυρος ο μεγας ηταν ο βασιλιας που εδωσε τα πρωτα ανθρωπινα δικαιωματα για τον περσικο λαο και η αξια του αναγνωριστηκε απο πολλους ανα τους αιωνες επισης ηταν αυτος που εκανε την περσια αυτοκρατορια εμεινε ομως επεισης γνωστος και για το κοινονικο του εργο

ενας αρυος που θελει να σεβετε τον εαυτο του και την ιδεολογια του δεν μπορει να λεγετε και ναζι και αρυος ταυτοχρονος καθως οι ναζι δεν αφησαν καμια κοινονικοπολιτιστικη κληρονομια ενω η περσια αφησε 8000 χρονια ιστορια οποτε δεν υπαρχει καμια συγκριση.

επισης ενας αρυος δεν βλεπει ποτε επιθετικα κανενα ουτε κραταει κακια σε κανενα
εν κατακλιδη παραθετω εδω τις δεκα ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΕΣ ΕΝΤΟΛΕΣ ΤΟΥ ΑΡΥΟΥ
The 10 commandments of an Aryan



Be a noble man/woman in all of your life until the end of your days
Be a kind husband/wife and love your better half
Be a lover of art and literature, an Aryan can’t be a barbarian
Be a lover of knowledge and always seek to find her
Be a brave man/woman and always honor Iran no matter in which other Aryan country you have been born in.
To honor the Aryan religion of Zoroastrianism even if you are not a Zoroastrian
To defend your faith and your people against Ahriman(evil) and all of its forms
To love Nature because you are a part of Nature as well
To love all those who loves you and fight to the death your enemies
To remember the past so you can foreseen the future and create a better one

THE GREAT EMPEROR JULIAN(english version)


The emperor Flavius Claudius Julianus reigned from 360 to 26 June 363, when he was killed fighting against the Persians.[[1]] Despite his short rule, his emperorship was pivotal in the development of the history of the later Roman empire. This essay is not meant to be a comprehensive look at the various issues central to the reign of Julian and the history of the later empire. Rather, this short work is meant to be a brief history and introduction for the general reader. Julian was the last direct descendent of the Constantinian line to ascend to the purple, and it is one of history's great ironies that he was the last non-Christian emperor. As such, he has been vilified by most Christian sources, beginning with John Chrysostom and Gregory Nazianzus in the later fourth century. This tradition was picked up by the fifth century Eusebian continuators Sozomen, Socrates Scholasticus, and Theodoret and passed on to scholars down through the 20th century. Most contemporary sources, however, paint a much more balanced picture of Julian and his reign. The adoption of Christianity by emperors and society, while still a vital concern, was but one of several issues that concerned Julian.

It is fortunate that extensive writings from Julian himself exist, which help interpret his reign in the light of contemporary evidence. Still extant are some letters, several panegyrics, and a few satires. Other contemporary sources include the soldier Ammianus Marcellinus' history, correspondence between Julian and Libanius of Antioch, several panegyrics, laws from the Theodosian Code, inscriptions, and coinage.[[2]] These sources show Julian's emphasis on restoration. He saw himself as the restorer of the traditional values of Roman society. Of course much of this was rhetoric, meant to defend Julian against charges that he was a usurper. At the same time this theme of restoration was central to all emperors of the fourth century.[[3]] Julian thought that he was the one emperor who could regain what was viewed as the lost glory of the Roman empire. To achieve this goal he courted select groups of social elites to get across his message of restoration. This was the way that emperors functioned in the fourth century. By choosing whom to include in the sharing of power, they sought to shape society.

Early Life

Julian was born at Constantinople in 331.[[4]] His father was Julius Constantius, half-brother of the emperor Constantine through Constantius Chlorus, and his mother was Basilina, Julius' second wife. Julian had two half-brothers via Julius' first marriage. One of these was Gallus, who played a major role in Julian's life.[[5]] Julian appeared destined for a bright future via his father's connection to the Constantinian house. After many years of tense relations with his three half-brothers, Constantine seemed to have welcomed them into the fold of the imperial family. From 333 to 335, Constantine conferred a series of honors upon his three half-siblings, including appointing Julius Constantius as one of the consuls for 335.[[6]]Julian's mother was equally distinguished. Ammianus related that she was from a noble family.[[7]] This is supported by Libanius, who claimed that she was the daughter of Julius Julianus, a Praetorian Prefect under Licinius, who was such a model of administrative virtue that he was pardoned and honored by Constantine.[[8]]

Despite the fact that his mother died shortly after giving birth to him, Julian experienced an idyllic early childhood([[9]] This ended when Constantius II conducted a purge of many of his relatives shortly after Constantine's death in 337, particularly targeting the families of Constantine's half-brothers.[[10]] Julian and Gallus were spared, probably due to their young age. Julian was put under the care of Mardonius, a Scythian eunuch who had tutored his mother, in 339, and was raised in the Greek philosophical tradition, and probably lived in Nicomedia.[[11]] Ammianus also supplied the fact that while in Nicomedia, Julian was cared for by the local bishop Eusebius, of whom the future emperor was a distant relation.[[12]] Julian was educated by some of the most famous names in grammar and rhetoric in the Greek world at that time, including Nicocles and Hecebolius.[[13]] In 344 Constantius II sent Julian and Gallus to Macellum in Cappadocia, where they remained for six years.[[14]] In 351, Gallus was made Caesar by Constantius II and Julian was allowed to return to Nicomedia, where he studied under Aedesius, Eusebius, and Chrysanthius, all famed philosophers, and was exposed to the Neo-Platonism that would become such a prominent part of his life.[[15]] But Julian was most proud of the time he spent studying under Maximus of Ephesus, a noted Neo-Platonic philospher and theurgist. It was Maximus who completed Julian's full-scale conversion to Neo-Platonism. Later, when he was Caesar, Julian told of how he put letters from this philosopher under his pillows so that he would continue to absorb wisdom while he slept, and while campaigning on the Rhine, he sent his speeches to Maximus for approval before letting others hear them.[[16]] When Gallus was executed in 354 for treason by Constantius II, Julian was summoned to Italy and essentially kept under house arrest at Comum, near Milan, for seven months before Constantius' wife Eusebia convinced the emperor that Julian posed no threat.[[17]] This allowed Julian to return to Greece and continue his life as a scholar where he studied under the Neo-Platonist Priscus.[[18]] Julian's life of scholarly pursuit, however, ended abruptly when he was summoned to the imperial court and made Caesar by Constantius II on 6 November 355.[[19]]

Julian as Caesar

Constantius II realized an essential truth of the empire that had been evident since the time of the Tetrarchy--the empire was too big to be ruled effectively by one man.[[20]] Julian was pressed into service as Caesar, or subordinate emperor, because an imperial presence was needed in the west, in particular in the Gallic provinces. Julian, due to the emperor's earlier purges, was the only viable candidate of the imperial family left who could act as Caesar. Constantius enjoined Julian with the task of restoring order along the Rhine frontier. A few days after he was made Caesar, Julian was married to Constantius' sister Helena in order to cement the alliance between the two men.[[21]] On 1 December 355, Julian journeyed north, and in Augusta Taurinorum he learned that Alamannic raiders had destroyed Colonia Agrippina. He then proceeded to Vienne where he spent the winter.[[22]] At Vienne, he learned that Augustudunum was also under siege, but was being held by a veteran garrison. He made this his first priority, and arrived there on 24 June 356. When he had assured himself that the city was in no immediate danger, he journeyed to Augusta Treverorum via Autessioduram, and from there to Durocortorum where he rendezvoused with his army. Julian had the army stage a series of punitive strikes around the Dieuse region, and then he moved them towards the Argentoratum/Mongontiacum region when word of barbarian incursions reached him.[[23]]

From there, Julian moved on to Colonia Agrippina, and negotiated a peace with the local barbarian leaders who had assaulted the city. He then wintered at Senonae.[[24]] He spent the early part of the campaigning season of 357 fighting off besiegers at Senonae, and then conducting operations around Lugdunum and Tres Tabernae.[[25]] Later that summer, he encountered his watershed moment as a military general. Ammianus went into great detail about Julian's victory over seven rogue Alamannic chieftains near Argentoratum, and Julian himself bragged about it in his later writing.[[26]] After this battle, the soldiers acclaimed Julian Augustus, but he rejected this title.[[27]] After mounting a series of follow-up raids into Alamannic territory, he retired to winter quarters at Lutetia, and on the way defeated some Frankish raiders in the Mosa region.[[28]] Julian considered this campaign one of the major events of his time as Caesar.[[29]]

Julian began his 358 military campaigns early, hoping to catch the barbarians by surprise. His first target was the Franks in the northern Rhine region. He then proceeded to restore some forts in the Mosa region, but his soldiers threatened to mutiny because they were on short rations and had not been paid their donative since Julian had become Caesar.[[30]] After he soothed his soldiers, Julian spent the rest of the summer negotiating a peace with various Alamannic leaders in the mid and lower Rhine areas, and retired to winter quarters at Lutetia.[[31]] In 359, he prepared once again to carry out a series of punitive expeditions against the Alamanni in the Rhine region who were still hostile to the Roman presence. In preparation, the Caesar repopulated seven previously destroyed cities and set them up as supply bases and staging areas. This was done with the help of the people with whom Julian had negotiated a peace the year before. Julian then had a detachment of lightly armed soldiers cross the Rhine near Mogontiacum and conduct a guerilla strike against several chieftains. As a result of these campaigns, Julian was able to negotiate a peace with all but a handful of the Alamannic leaders, and he retired to winter quarters at Lutetia.[[32]]



Of course, Julian did more than act as a general during his time as Caesar. According to Ammianus, Julian was an able administrator who took steps to correct the injustices of Constantius' appointees. Ammianus related the story of how Julian prevented Florentius, the Praetorian Prefect of Gaul, from raising taxes, and also how Julian actually took over as governor for the province of Belgica Secunda.[[33]] Hilary, bishop of Poitiers, supported Ammianus' basic assessment of Julian in this regard when he reported that Julian was an able representative of the emperor to the Gallic provincials.[[34]] There is also epigraphic evidence to support Julian's popularity amongst the provincial elites. An inscription found near Beneventum in Apulia reads:

"To Flavius Claudius Julianus, most noble and sanctified Caesar, from the caring Tocius Maximus, vir clarissimus, for the care of the res publica from Beneventum".[[35]]

Tocius Maximus, as a vir clarissimus, was at the highest point in the social spectrum and was a leader in his local community. This inscription shows that Julian was successful in establishing a positive image amongst provincial elites while he was Caesar.

Julian Augustus

In early 360, Constantius, driven by jealousy of Julian's success, stripped Julian of many troops and officers, ostensibly because the emperor needed them for his upcoming campaign against the Persians.[[36]] One of the legions ordered east, the Petulantes, did not want to leave Gaul because the majority of the soldiers in the unit were from this region. As a result they mutinied and hailed Julian as Augustus at Lutetia.[[37]] Julian refused this acclamation as he had done at Argentoratum earlier, but the soldiers would have none of his denial. They raised him on a shield and adorned him with a neck chain, which had formerly been the possession of the standard-bearer of the Petulantes and symbolized a royal diadem. Julian appeared reluctantly to acquiesce to their wishes, and promised a generous donative.[[38]] The exact date of his acclamation is unknown, but most scholars put it in February or March.[[39]] Julian himself supported Ammianus' picture of a jealous Constantius. In his Letter to the Athenians, a document constructed to answer charges that he was a usurper, Julian stated that from the start he, as Caesar, had been meant as a figurehead to the soldiers and provincials. The real power he claimed lay with the generals and officials already present in Gaul. In fact, according to Julian, the generals were charged with watching him as much as the enemy.[[40]] His account of the actual acclamation closely followed what Ammianus told us, but he stressed even more his reluctance to take power. Julian claimed that he did so only after praying to Zeus for guidance.[[41]]

Fearing the reaction of Constantius, Julian sent a letter to his fellow emperor justifying the events at Lutetia and trying to arrange a peaceful solution.[[42]] This letter berated Constantius for forcing the troops in Gaul into an untenable situation. Ammianus stated that Julian's letter blamed Constantius' decision to transfer Gallic legions east as the reason for the soldiers' rebellion. Julian once again asserted that he was an unwilling participant who was only following the desire of the soldiers.[[43]] In both of these basic accounts Ammianus and Julian are playing upon the theme of restoration. Implicit in their version of Julian's acclamation is the argument that Constantius was unfit to rule. The soldiers were the vehicle of the gods' will. The Letter to the Athenians is full of references to the fact that Julian was assuming the mantle of Augustus at the instigation of the gods. Ammianus summed up this position nicely when he related the story of how, when Julian was agonizing over whether to accept the soldiers' acclamation, he had a dream in which he was visited by the Genius (guardian spirit) of the Roman state. The Genius told Julian that it had often tried to bestow high honors upon Julian but had been rebuffed. Now, the Genius went on to say, was Julian's final chance to take the power that was rightfully his. If the Caesar refused this chance, the Genius would depart forever, and both Julian and the state would rue Julian's rejection.[[44]] Julian himself wrote a letter to his friend Maximus of Ephesus in November of 361 detailing his thoughts on his proclamation. In this letter, Julian stated that the soldiers proclaimed him Augustus against his will. Julian, however, defended his accession, saying that the gods willed it and that he had treated his enemies with clemency and justice. He went on to say that he led the troops in propitiating the traditional deities, because the gods commanded him to return to the traditional rites, and would reward him if he fulfilled this duty.[[45]]

During 360 an uneasy peace simmered between the two emperors. Julian spent the 360 campaigning season continuing his efforts to restore order along the Rhine, while Constantius continued operations against the Persians.[[46]] Julian wintered in Vienne, and celebrated his Quinquennalia. It was at this time that his wife Helena died, and he sent her remains to Rome for a proper burial at his family villa on the Via Nomentana where the body of her sister was entombed.[[47]] The uneasy peace held through the summer of 361, but Julian concentrated his military operations around harassing the Alamannic chieftain Vadomarius and his allies, who had concluded a peace treaty with Constantius some years earlier.[[48]] By the end of the summer, Julian decided to put an end to the waiting and gathered his army to march east against Constantius.[[49]] The empire teetered on the brink of another civil war. Constantius had spent the summer negotiating with the Persians and making preparations for possible military action against his cousin.[[50]] When he was assured that the Persians would not attack, he summoned his army and sallied forth to meet Julian.[[51]] As the armies drew inexorably closer to one another, the empire was saved from another bloody civil war when Constantius died unexpectedly of natural causes on 3 November near the town of Mopsucrenae in Cilicia, naming Julian -- the sources say-- as his legitimate successor.[[52]]

Julian was in Dacia when he learned of his cousin's death. He made his way through Thrace and came to Constantinople on 11 December 361 where Julian honored the emperor with the funeral rites appropriate for a man of his station.[[53]] Julian immediately set about putting his supporters in positions of power and trimming the imperial bureaucracy, which had become extremely overstaffed during Constantius' reign.[[54]] Cooks and barbers had increased during the late emperor's reign and Julian expelled them from his court.[[55]] Ammianus gave a mixed assessment of how the new emperor handled the followers of Constantius. Traditionally, emperors were supposed to show clemency to the supporters of a defeated enemy. Julian, however, gave some men over to death to appease the army. Ammianus used the case of Ursulus, Constantius' comes sacrum largitionum, to illustrate his point. Ursulus had actually tried to acquire money for the Gallic troops when Julian had first been appointed Caesar, but he had also made a disparaging remark about the ineffectiveness of the army after the battle of Amida. The soldiers remembered this, and when Julian became sole Augustus, they demanded Ursulus' head. Julian obliged, much to the disapproval of Ammianus.[[56]] This seems to be a case of Julian courting the favor of the military leadership, and is indicative of a pattern in which Julian courted the goodwill of various societal elites to legitimize his position as emperor.

Another case in point is the officials who made up the imperial bureaucracy. Many of them were subjected to trial and punishment.[[57]]To achieve this goal, during the last weeks of December 361 Julian assembled a military tribunal at Chalcedon, empanelling six judges to try the cases. The president of the tribunal was Salutius, just promoted to the rank of Praetorian Prefect; the five other members were Mamertinus, the orator, and four general officers: Jovinus, Agilo, Nevitta, and Arbetio.[[58]] Relative to the proceedings of the tribunal, Ammianus noted that the judges, " . . . oversaw the cases more vehemently than was right or fair, with the exception of a few . . .."[[59]] Ammianus' account of Julian's attempt at reform of the imperial bureaucracy is supported by legal evidence from the Theodosian Code. A series of laws sent to Mamertinus, Julian's appointee as Praetorian Prefect in Italy, Illyricum, and Africa, illustrate this point nicely. On 6 June 362, Mamertinus received a law that prohibited provincial governors from bypassing the Vicars when giving their reports to the Prefect.[[60]] Traditionally, Vicars were given civil authority over a group of provinces, and were in theory meant to serve as a middle step between governors and Prefects.[[61]] This law suggests that the Vicars were being left out, at least in Illyricum. Julian issued another edict to Mamertinus on 22 February 362 to stop abuse of the public post by governors. According to this law, only Mamertinus could issue post warrants, but the Vicars were given twelve blank warrants to be used as they saw fit, and each governor was given two.[[62]] Continuing the trend of bureaucratic reform, Julian also imposed penalties on governors who purposefully delayed appeals in court cases they had heard.[[63]] The emperor also established a new official to weigh solidi used in official government transactions to combat coin clipping.[[64]]

For Julian, reigning in the abuses of imperial bureaucrats was one step in restoring the prestige of the office of emperor. Because he could not affect all elements of society personally, Julian, like other Neo-Flavian emperors, decided to concentrate on select groups of societal elites as intercessors between himself and the general populace. One of these groups was the imperial bureaucracy. Julian made it very clear that imperial officials were intercessors in a very real sense in a letter to Alypius, Vicar of Britain. In this letter, sent from Gaul sometime before 361, the emperor praises Alypius for his use of "mildness and moderation with courage and force" in his rule of the provincials. Such virtues were characteristic of the emperors, and it was good that Alypius is representing Julian in this way.[[65]] Julian courted the army because it put him in power. Another group he sought to include in his rule was the traditional Senatorial aristocracy. One of his first appointments as consul was Claudius Mamertinus, a Gallic Senator and rhetorician. Mamertinus' speech in praise of Julian delivered at Constantinople in January of 362 is preserved. In this speech, Claudius presented his consular selection as inaugurating a new golden age and Julian as the restorer of the empire founded by Augustus. The image Mamertinus gave of his own consulate inaugurating a new golden age is not merely formulaic. The comparison of Julian to Augustus has very real, if implicit, relevance to Claudius' situation. Claudius emphasized the imperial period as the true age of renewal. Augustus ushered in a new era with his formation of a partnership between the emperor and the Senate based upon a series of honors and offices bestowed upon the Senate in return for their role as intercessor between emperor and populace. It was this system that Julian was restoring, and the consulate was one concrete example of this bond.[[66]]To be chosen as a consul by the emperor, who himself had been divinely mandated, was a divine honor.[[67]] In addition to being named consul, Mamertinus went on to hold several offices under Julian, including the Prefecture of Italy, Illyricum, and Africa.[[68]] Similarly, inscriptional evidence illustrates a link between municipal elites and Julian during his time as Caesar, something which continued after he became emperor.[[69]] One concrete example comes from the municipal senate of Aceruntia in Apulia, which established a monument on which Julian is styled as "Repairer of the World."[[70]]

One group he sought to disenfranchise was the Christians. Julian had a nominally Christian upbringing, but by the time he was emperor he had clearly rejected this belief system in favor of Neo-Platonism. There is some debate over just how much he was exposed to Christianity as a young man.[[71]] Some scholars use Basilina's relation to Eusebius of Nicomedia, a brief passage in Athanasius naming a certain Basilina as a supporter of the Arian cause, and a later Christian source which states that Basilina left her property to the Church upon her death as evidence that Julian's mother was Christian.[[72]] The evidence seems rather flimsy. Regardless, Julian was under the care of Eusebius of Nicomedia for a short time, and at the time of his elevation to Augustus he was at least nominally Christian. Julian attended a service celebrating Epiphany in January of 361 in order to court the support of uncommitted Christians to his claim to the rank of Augustus. Julian seems to have given up actual Christian belief before his acclamation as emperor and was a practitioner of more traditional Greco-Roman religious beliefs, in particular, a follower of certain late antique Platonist philosophers who were especially adept at theurgy as was noted earlier.[[73]] In fact Julian himself spoke of his conversion to Neo-Platonism in a letter to the Alexandrians written in 363. He stated that he had abandoned Christianity when he was twenty years old and been an adherent of the traditional Greco-Roman deities for the twelve years prior to writing this letter.[[74]]

Julian took the occasion of Constantius' fortuitous death openly to declare his paganism. At first it appeared that he was not going to discriminate actively against Christians. In fact, he lifted the ban on Arians and allowed these men and other radical Christian sects to return to their former place in society.[[75]] Julian spoke of this policy in a letter to one Aetius, an Anomean bishop, in which he invited the bishop to return to his see without fear of reprisal.[[76]] Elsewhere Julian noted that the Christians had become a powerful force during the reigns of the earlier Neo-Flavian emperors and made life difficult for pagans and Christian splinter groups, and he hoped to stop the wholesale slaughter that was occurring between the various factions in the name of religion.[[77]] Ammianus, however, stated that this policy was actually a ruse to allow free reign to Christian discord so that the Christians would destroy themselves.[[78]]

Soon, Julian became very hostile to Christianity, developing a three-fold strategy effectively to disenfranchise Christians. First, he used legislation to cut off Christians from contact with the mainstream community. Next, he attempted to establish a pagan church structure to rival that of Christianity. Finally, he mounted a philosophical assault on Christianity, trying to show that its belief system was novel and harmful, and also to portray Christians as apostates from Judaism, a much older, more established, and more accepted religion. There is evidence of Julian's attempt to legally disenfranchise Christians both by taking away any special exemptions that they could claim due to their religious beliefs and by prosecuting them for actively advocating their beliefs. A law of the Theodosian Code prohibits decurions from avoiding their compulsory duties on the grounds that they are Christian, and Ammianus spoke of legislation barring Christians from teaching rhetoric and grammar.[[79]] Julian's actual rescript regarding the latter is included amongst his collected letters, where he declared that Christians who taught the classics were impious, because they taught the traditional forms of worship but ridiculed the beliefs, which had been passed down from the forefathers.[[80]] In another example of Julian's legal assault upon Christianity, a law from 405 upholds his law banning the Donatist sect in Africa.[[81]] In a letter of 362 to the citizens of Bostra, Julian admonished the Christian citizens involved in factional strife there that if they sacrificed to the traditional deities, they could remain citizens in good standing. Otherwise they would be stripped of their citizenship.[[82]]

The second and third parts of Julian's strategy to discredit Christianity are better documented. Two letters show specifically the issues Julian wanted to address by structuring pagan leadership on the Christian model. Sometime in late 361 or early 362, Julian sent a letter to Theodorus making him high priest of the diocese of Asia with the power to appoint priests in all the cities in this region. Theodorus was to see that such priests were worthy of the office. Specifically, they were to be just towards their fellow citizens and treat the Gods with piety. In this epistle, Julian lamented that current society had forgotten "customs of the forefathers in religious matters."[[83]] In another letter we see the details of Julian's religious reforms. In 362 Julian sent this missive to Arsacius, high priest of Galatia. He complained that while the traditional rituals had been restored, the Christians continued to gain converts. This angered Julian because he considered Christians atheists. Julian went on to demand that the priests in Galatia put their beliefs into positive social action, such as copying Christian charity, care for the dead, and a holy lifestyle. He then proceeded to lay down a series of prohibitions. No priest was to go to a tavern, frequent the theatre, or engage in a base profession. Julian then commanded that Arsacius set up hostels for charity in every city in Galatia. Furthermore, 1/5 of 30,000 modii of wheat and 60,000 pints of wine allocated to Galatia were to be used for charity distribution. Julian told Arsacius that the helping of the community by the priests was the way of the forefathers, with such practices dating back to the time of Homer.[[84]]

One of the fundamental issues raised in these letters is that of patronage. Julian feared that Christian practices were causing many citizens to look to other sources than the emperor for protection and security. Julian as emperor was supreme patron, and it was his duty to provide for his clients, the citizens of society. As was suggested earlier, a goal of Julian's reforms in general was to set up a series of intercessory social institutions. The earlier letter to Alypius and Mamertinus' panegyric established how Julian wished various societal elites to function as intercessors between himself and the broader society at large. Julian wished for his religious officials to serve in this same capacity, and it infuriated him that Christian leaders were usurping a role that was rightly his to bestow. In yet another letter from 362 to an unnamed official, Julian puts forth these very ideas. Julian stated that as emperor and supreme pontiff, he represented the link between general society and the divine. The unnamed official, by harassing imperial priests and generally interfering in religious matters, was disrupting Julian in his role as emperor.[[85]]

The third prong of Julian's attack against Christianity was to discredit the very legitimacy this sect had gained in the forty-eight years before Julian assumed office. Julian laid out most of his arguments in his treatise Against the Galileans; it should be noted, in passing, that Julian was indebted to Porphyry in his composition of this work. In this work he first linked the Christians to Judaism. He then attacked the Judeo-Christian doctrine that humans as created beings were not divine.[[86]] Such a belief was anathema to traditional philosophic thought, which in general held that humans were simply a part of the divinity who had been separated due to some catastrophe.[[87]] Julian then went on to establish how Christianity was at odds with its Jewish roots, because Judaism did not acknowledge Christ, the key figure in Christian belief.[[88]] Julian asserted Judaism, though still an impious religion, was more legitimate than Christianity, because at least it was thousands of years old. He questioned how anybody could practice a religion that had only three hundred years of history behind it.[[89]] Julian put his attack on Christian ideology into practice by attempting to reconstruct the Jewish Temple at Jerusalem, which had been destroyed by the emperor Titus in A.D. 70.[[90]] Christians saw the destruction of the Temple as key event fulfilling prophecy that invalidated ancient Jewish Law and validated the New Testament.[[91]] In 363, Julian appointed Alypius to head the reconstruction of the Temple, but construction was halted due to mysterious balls of flame that kept erupting and killing the workers at the site.[[92]] Julian halted the project as he prepared for his Persian campaign, and it was never resumed.[[93]]

One of the main results of Christian impiety that offended Julian was their propensity to cause disruptions in the communities they lived in. One such case was in Alexandria, where the citizens lynched the unpopular bishop George after he had threatened to destroy the temple to the emperor's Genius.[[94]] Julian wrote a scathing letter to the citizens of Alexandria in 362 in which he asserted that the actions of the citizens had threatened the welfare of the community. According to Julian, the perpetrators had forgotten their forefathers. Furthermore, because the gods had appointed him to rule the world, the citizens had acted immoderately in slaying George without consulting Julian.[[95]]Similarly, he wrote a letter to Hecebolius in which he denounced the Arian Christians in Edessa for causing public riots and disturbing the harmony. He threatened to withdraw his clemency from that region if such continued.[[96]] Julian never had a chance to implement fully some of the reforms under discussion. After spending some time in Constantinople in 362, he began a journey through Asia Minor to Antioch, the jumping-off point for his Persian campaign, stopping along the way to visit the various communities in the region. At these stops he often gave money, men, and materials, thus showing concrete examples of his benefaction.[[97]] That winter, drought and a major earthquake struck the region. The Senate at Antioch became very angry and refused to support Julian when he did not divert resources gathered for his upcoming campaign against the Persians for relief to the disaster victims. This prompted Julian to write his satire Misopogon (or Beard Hater), but preparations for the war went on.[[98]]

The exact goals Julian had for his ill-fated Persian campaign were never clear. The Sassanid Persians, and before them the Parthians, had been a traditional enemy from the time of the Late Republic, and indeed Constantius had been conducting a war against them before Julian's accession forced the former to forge an uneasy peace. Julian, however, had no concrete reason to reopen hostilities in the east. Socrates Scholasticus attributed Julian's motives to imitation of Alexander the Great, but perhaps the real reason lay in his need to gather the support of the army. Despite his acclamation by the Gallic legions, relations between Julian and the top military officers was uneasy at best. A war against the Persians would have brought prestige and power both to Julian and the army.[[99]]

Julian set out on his fateful campaign on 5 March 363. Using his trademark strategy of striking quickly and where least expected, he moved his army through Heirapolis and from there speedily across the Euphrates and into the province of Mesopotamia, where he stopped at the town of Batnae. His plan was to eventually return through Armenia and winter in Tarsus.[[100]] Once in Mesopotamia, Julian was faced with the decision of whether to travel south through the province of Babylonia or cross the Tigris into Assyria, and he eventually decided to move south through Babylonia and turn west into Assyria at a later date. By 27 March,[[101]] he had the bulk of his army across the Euphrates, and had also arranged a flotilla to guard his supply line along the mighty river.[[102]] He then left his generals Procopius and Sebastianus to help Arsacius, the king of Armenia and a Roman client, to guard the northern Tigris line. It was also during this time that he received the surrender of many prominent local leaders who had nominally supported the Persians. These men supplied Julian with money and troops for further military action against their former masters.[[103]] Julian decided to turn south into Babylonia and proceeded along the Euphrates, coming to the fortress of Cercusium at the junction of the Abora and Euphrates Rivers around the first of April,[[104]] and from there he took his army west to a region called Zaitha[[105]] near the abandoned town of Dura where they visited the tomb of the emperor Gordian which was in the area. On April 7 he set out from there into the heart of Babylonia and towards Assyria.[[106]]

Ammianus then stated that Julian and his army crossed into Assyria, which on the face of things appears very confusing. Julian still seems to be operating within the province of Babylonia between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.[[107]] The confusion is alleviated when one realizes that,for Ammianus, the region of Assyria encompassed the provinces of Babylonia and Assyria.[[108]] On their march, Julian's forces took the fortress of Anatha,[[109]] received the surrender and support of several more local princes, and ravaged the countryside of Assyria between the rivers.[[110]] As the army continued south, they came across the fortresses Thilutha and Achaiachala, but these places were too well defended and Julian decided to leave them alone.[[111]] Further south were the cities Diacira and Ozogardana, which the Roman forces sacked and burned.[[112]] Soon, Julian came to Pirisabora and a brief siege ensued, but the city fell and was also looted and destroyed.[[113]] It was also at this time that the Roman army met its first systematic resistance from the Persians. As the Romans penetrated further south and west, the local inhabitants began to flood their route.[[114]] Nevertheless, the Roman forces pressed on and came to Maiozamalcha, a sizable city not far from Ctesiphon. After a short siege, this city too fell to Julian.[[115]] Inexorably, Julian's forces zeroed in on Ctesiphon, but as they drew closer, the Persian resistance grew fiercer, with guerilla raids whittling at Julian's men and supplies. A sizable force of the army was lost and the emperor himself was almost killed taking a fort a few miles from the target city.[[116]]

Finally, the army approached Ctesiphon following a canal that linked the Tigris and Euphrates. It soon became apparent after a few preliminary skirmishes that a protracted siege would be necessary to take this important city.[[117]] Many of his generals, however, thought that pursuing this course of action would be foolish.[[118]] Julian reluctantly agreed, but became enraged by this failure and ordered his fleet to be burned as he decided to march through the province of Assyria.[[119]] Julian had planned for his army to live off the land, but the Persians employed a scorched-earth policy.[[120]] When it became apparent that his army would perish (because his supplies were beginning to dwindle)[[121]] from starvation[[122]] and the heat[[123]] if he continued his campaign, and also in the face of superior numbers of the enemy, Julian ordered a retreat on 16 June.[[124]] As the Roman army retreated, they were constantly harassed by guerilla strikes.[[125]] It was during one of these raids that Julian got caught up in the fighting and took a spear to his abdomen. Mortally wounded he was carried to his tent, where, after conferring with some of his officers, he died. The date was 26 June 363.[[126]]

about hellenic paganism


Hellenic Paganism

Ancient Greek Religion was polytheistic, consisting of the worship of many Gods. The Greeks believed that the Gods would offer protection and guide their city-states. This belief was identical to other earlier forms of Paganism.


Divinities were the most important element of Greek religion and much emphasis was placed on pleasing the Gods in order to live a life free of oppression and hardship. Like all Pagans, the Greeks believed that they had to worship and please the Gods in order to have good fortune. The Greeks participated in a number of rituals, rites, ceremonies and sacrifices in order to impress and placate the Gods. Temples, shrines and statues were erected as a designated place to offer sacrifices to the Gods.


Religion was a very important aspect of Greek society and culture, with the sacrifices and regular worships of Gods surving to unify the people in a common goal to please the Gods. The Greeks also placed an immense faith in the idea that an afterlife awaited them after their death. They firmly believed that this life was not the only reality in which the soul lives, but after this lifetime, a whole new and different one awaited them.

The origins of Greek history has been lost in pre-history, the only knowledge that has remained is that the Greeks assimilated cults of pre-Greek inhabitants of the Peninsula. An example of this can be seen when the Greeks encountered the Flourishing society of the Minoan civilization whose central divinities influenced characteristics of later Greek Goddesses.


Greek religion was ritual based, practicing a flexible set of beliefs. It was unlike many modern religions, because it made no claims of universality, they did not proselytize, they did not participate in regular clergies, no hierarchical system, no sacred texts or moral code that is backed by religious beliefs. Scholars of the Renaissance believed that Greek religion simply consisted of an abundant treasury of legendary tales told by Greek authors. However Greek religion was not simply legendary tales and fictitious myths, it was a complex organization with each city-state containing its own divinities, which acted to cement the body of citizens into a true community. The Divine played an integral part in Greek religion and their society. The Divine entered all parts of Greek society, domestic affairs, civic organization, gender, agriculture and war. This belief is also reflected in many other earlier forms of Paganism. The Greeks attempted to please the Gods, fearing that they could upset them with insolence and impiety. The Greeks placed great importance on Twelve Pantheon Gods. They also worshipped other deities such as oracles, lesser divinities, demi Gods and Heroes.


The Greeks worshipped many Gods, creating a polytheistic society. The Gods were admired and feared, being distinguished from man by their immortality. The Greeks believed that the Gods controlled natural and social forces and resided on Mount Olympus. The Greeks were an earth based culture as were most early forms of Paganism, holding a high respect for nature and the earth. To reflect this love of nature, the Greeks placed different Gods in charge of different aspects of life.


They had Gods of the countryside; Nymphs, the Goat- God Pan, Naead ( dwelling in springs), dryads (dwelling in trees), Nereids ( dwelling in the sea) and Satyrs, showing their respect for nature. The twelve main Gods were: Hades; God of the underworld, Aphrodite, Goddess of love, Apollo, God of light, purity, guidance, healing and music, Zeus King of Gods, thunder, lightning, gold and kings, Athere; Goddess of Athens, war, handicrafts and wisdom, Demeter; Goddess of harvest, Hera, Hermes, Hestia, Hephaistos, Poseidon, Artemis and Ares.


Although these twelve Gods were the most important, facets of their personalities were altered by sporadically adding new Gods. The Greeks believed that the Gods were pre-eminently social beings, upholding an organized universe. The Gods were often depicted as humans as the Romans and other early forms of Paganism did. The Gods also occasionally assumed animal guise. Another interesting factor was that each God assumed and represented a different aspect and function of Greek life. Sometimes Gods can be worshipped under different names, for example Zeus can be worshipped under the name Omrios. The Greeks used the Gods to explain the occurrence of things, which they could not understand through lack of scientific proof. For example they thought that the Gods controlled the rising and setting of the sun and created great myths about such events.


Although the Greeks heavily depended on their Gods to uphold their society, it is evident that they relied on other deities as well. This can be seen through the Greeks faith in a deity, which they called an Oracle. An oracles primary function was to offer guidance and advice. In archaic times, the Greeks sought out the Oracles advice in relation to religious and political aspects of life. They were also used as a mean to seek out the will of the Gods. Sanctuaries were dedicated to the Oracles to indicate their importance. Shrines were also erected for the Oracles and became places of international prestige. Oracles controlled many human decisions about health, sickness, peace, war, colonization, migration, crime and punishment.

In order to show their appreciation to the Gods and Oracles, the Greeks would perform a series of rituals, ceremonies, sacrifices and offerings as other forms of Paganism did. Sacrifices of animals; sheep, cows, goats, pigs and bulls were made, as well as the occasional human sacrifice as a present to the Gods. Chosen animals for sacrifice formed a procession, they were crowned, adorned, purified with water and sprinkled with barley. Many temples and shrines were also erected as a mark of respect and for a place to offer their sacrifices. It is obvious that the Greeks placed a lot of pride in their temples and shrines, for extensive time was taken to re-build, preserve and beautify them. Further evidence of the Greeks desire to please the Gods can be seen through their offerings. The Greeks offered such things as stone freezes, "gold vessels, wheat, wine and honey, milk, water and firstfruits." Prayers and hymns accompanied sacrifices and sometimes performances and other ritual acts followed such as dances or early forms of drama.


The function of these sacrifices aside from pleasing the Gods was to unite the people in a common and regular pattern and to intergrade them into the city. It is clear that many similarities can be drawn between other forms of Paganism and Greek religion, through their similar worshiping techniques, their desire to please the Gods and their polytheistic nature.

The after life was also very important to the Greeks, as they believed that their souls were carried on to another dimension and lived on after death. This ideology about death was a direct contrast to other forms of Paganism. Other Pagan religions believed that there was no Heaven or Hell, rather they believed in re-incarnation. They believed that the soul was passed on to another body at the time of death. This is one of the only aspects that distinguishes Greek religion from other forms of Paganism.


The Greeks held a strong belief that your body needed to be buried with the goods and wealth that you had accumulated in this lifetime in order to carry them through into the next life. Gravesites recovered have shown that people have been buried with food, cloths and jeweled ornaments. Kings were buried with bronze weapons, chariots and their horses. In some cases the wives and slaves were killed and buried beside the dead so that the person could take their family with them into the next lifetime. Their bodies are well preserved and embalmed so that they are not ruined for the next life.


It is obvious that the Greeks shared many common aspects with other forms of Paganism. Both held the Gods in high esteem, and attempted to placate them with rites, worships and sacrifices. Another common theme was the fact that both Greek religion and other forms of Paganism were earth based cultures, placing a high respect upon nature. Another link between Greek religion and other forms of Paganism can be seen by their polytheistic nature. The worship of many Gods is linked throughout all of the Pagan religions; Wicca, Druidism, Witchcraft and Neo-Paganism. The only contrast between Greek religion and other forms of Paganism can be seen through their differing beliefs about the after-life. Whilst most Pagan religions hold the belief that their spirit was passed on from one body to the other, Greek religion centered on the belief that the soul moved onto another life, such as Heaven or Hell.

ΙΟΥΛΙΑΝΟΣ ΑΛΗΘΕΙΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΨΕΥΔΟΙ



ολοι ξερουμε περιπου την ιστορια του ιουλιανου του φιλοσοφου που κακως ονομαστικε αποστατης απο τους χριστιανους

για οσους δεν ξερουν την ιστορια του παραθετω εδω την ιστορια του εν συντομια

Νεανικά χρόνια

Ο Ιουλιανός ήταν μέλος της αυτοκρατορικής οικογένειας, εξάδελφος του Κωνστάντιου Β' και γεννήθηκε το 331 ή 332. Η παιδική ηλικία του σημαδεύτηκε από εξαιρετικά βίαια γεγονότα που πιθανά σημάδεψαν ανεξίτηλα τον χαρακτήρα του. Αμέσως μετά τον θάνατο του Μ. Κωνσταντίνου το 337, ο στρατός λυντσάρισε τους ετεροθαλείς αδελφούς του Ιούλιο (πατέρα του Ιουλιανού και του Γάλλου) και Δαλμάτιο, τον μεγαλύτερο αδελφό του Ιουλιανού και άλλους συγγενείς και υποστηρικτές τους. Κατά την επίσημη εκδοχή, ο στρατός έδρασε αυθόρμητα, δίνοντας βάση στη φήμη οτι τα αδέλφια του Μ. Κωνσταντίνου δηλητηρίασαν τον αυτοκράτορα.[1]. Φαίνεται όμως πιθανότερο οτι ο ίδιος ο Κωνστάντιος Β' ενορχήστρωσε τη μαζική δολοφονία των συγγενών του και σ' αυτή την εκδοχή συνηγορεί η μετέπειτα, εκδικητική καθώς φαίνεται, εκτέλεση πολλών αυλικών του Κωνσταντίου από τον Ιουλιανό, με την ίδια πρόφαση οτι το είχε ζητήσει ο στρατός.[2]

Μετά τη σφαγή του πατέρα τους, ο Κωνστάντιος παρέδωσε τα αδέλφια Ιουλιανό και Γάλλο στον επίσκοπο Ευσέβιο Νικομηδείας ο οποίος εμπιστεύτηκε τη μόρφωση του Ιουλιανού στον Μαρδόνιο, έναν μορφωμένο Γότθο ευνούχο, για 4 χρόνια. Η ανάγνωση του Ομήρου υπό τη διδαχή του Μαρδονίου ήταν, σύμφωνα με τα ίδια τα γραπτά του Ιουλιανού, η χρυσή εποχή της παιδικής του ηλικίας.[3]

Σε ηλικία 11 ετών, ανέθεσαν τη μόρφωση του Ιουλιανού και του Γάλλου στον επίσκοπο Γεώργιο Καππαδοκίας, στο υποστατικό του τελευταίου στην Καισάρεια. Αργότερα ο Ιουλιανός θυμόταν με φρίκη τα χρόνια αυτά κοντά στον ραδιούργο επίσκοπο. Ωστόσο είναι βέβαιο οτι υπερέβαλλε κάπως στην κρίση του αυτή καθώς, μαζί με τις δυσάρεστες χριστιανικές σπουδές, μπορούσε να διαβάσει ποικιλία μη χριστιανικών κειμένων από την πλούσια βιβλιοθήκη του Γεωργίου, τα οποία και θυμόταν αργότερα.

Ο Ιουλιανός είχε κλίση προς τη μόρφωση και έλαβε ευρύτατη κλασσική παιδεία. Έτσι, το [348] που του επιτράπηκε να επιστρέψει στην Κωνσταντινούπολη, μαθήτευσε στον παγανιστή δάσκαλο Νικοκλή και τον χριστιανό Εκηβόλιο με τους οποίους διατήρησε επαφή και στη συνέχεια. Επίσης παρακολούθησε μαθήματα του παγανιστή Θεμίστιου. Το 350-51 πήγε στην Πέργαμο όπου μαθήτευσε κοντά στον φιλόσοφο Αιδέσιο, ο οποίος ήταν κάποτε μαθητής του νεοπλατωνικού φιλοσόφου Ιάμβλιχου και ανήκε στον κύκλο των νεοπλατωνικών που πίστευαν στην άμεση επαφή με το θείο (θεουργία).[4] Εκεί γνωρίστηκε με τον επίσης νεοπλατωνικό φιλόσοφο Μάξιμο με τον οποίο θα διατηρήσει στενή φιλία στην υπόλοιπη ζωή του. Μέσω του Μάξιμου, ο Ιουλιανός μεταστράφηκε οριστικά από το χριστιανισμό στις νεοπλατωνικές παγανιστικές αντιλήψεις, αν και κράτησε για καιρό κρυφή αυτή τη μεταστροφή[5]

Εν τω μεταξύ, ο αδελφός του Γάλλος, ο οποίος δεν του έμοιαζε καθόλου στο χαρακτήρα γιατί ήταν βάναυσος και στενών αντιλήψεων,[6] είχε αναγορευτεί από τον Κωνστάντιο Καίσαρας και σταλεί στην Αντιόχεια, ως επικεφαλής των ανατολικών επαρχιών. Η κακοδιοίκησή του όμως ανάγκασε τον Κωνστάντιο να τον καθαιρέσει και να τον εκτελέσει το 354. Ο ίδιος ο Ιουλιανός τέθηκε σε απομόνωση στο Μεδιόλανο (Μιλάνο) για έξη μήνες, όπου φοβόταν συνεχώς οτι θα τον εκτελέσουν. Τελικά, χάρη στην γυναίκα του Κωνστάντιου, αυτοκράτειρα Ευσεβία, σώθηκε από τα χειρότερα και στάλθηκε στην Αθήνα όπου παρακολούθησε τις διαλέξεις του χριστιανού ρήτορα Προαιρεσίου και του νεοπλατωνικού Πρίσκου. Επίσης μυήθηκε στα Ελευσίνια Μυστήρια. Στη συνέχεια, ξαναέπεσε σε δυσμένεια αλλά, και πάλι χάρη στην Ευσεβία, απελευθερώθηκε και αναγορεύτηκε Καίσαρας από τον Κωνστάντιο σε ηλικία 24 ετών (6 Νοεμβρίου 355).[7]
Καίσαρας (355-360)

Ο Κωνστάντιος έστειλε τον Ιουλιανό με μικρή στρατιωτική συνοδεία, με τη θεωρητική αποστολή να ηγηθεί του ρωμαϊκού στρατού στα δυτικά σύνορα και να αποκρούσει τις Γερμανικές φυλές που διέσχιζαν τον Ρήνο και λεηλατούσαν τις δυτικές επαρχίες. Επειδή όμως δεν εμπιστευόταν τις ικανότητες και την αφοσίωση του νεαρού εξαδέλφου του, ο Κωνστάντιος του έδωσε ως συνεργάτες δικούς του αφοσιωμένους πολιτικούς και στρατιωτικούς αξιωματούχους. Ο ιστορικός Αμμιανός Μαρκελλίνος γράφει οτι αυτοί έκαναν οτιδήποτε περνούσε από το χέρι τους για να δυσκολέψουν το έργο του Ιουλιανού καθώς ο Κωνστάντιος φοβόταν την άνοδο της αίγλης του εξαδέλφου του. Όμως το πιο πιθανό είναι οτι αυτοί οι αξιωματούχοι στάθηκαν πολύτιμοι συμβουλάτορες του άπειρου ως τότε Καίσαρα.[8][9]

Παρά τη στρατιωτική και πολιτική απειρία του όμως, ο Ιουλιανος διεξήγαγε αποτελεσματικές επιχειρήσεις απόκρουσης και εκκαθάρισης των βαρβαρικών εισβολών και απέκτησε την εμπιστοσύνη των στρατιωτών του. Αν και στην αρχή δεν συνεργάστηκε καλά με τους εκεί Ρωμαίους στρατηγούς, πέτυχε μεγάλη νίκη εναντίον των Αλαμανών στη Μάχη του Στρασβούργου (357). Αυτή η νίκη έπεισε τον Κωνστάντιο για τις ικανότητες του Ιουλιανού. Το έργο του πάντως δεν ήταν μόνο στρατιωτικό, καθώς ενδιαφέρθηκε για την αποτροπή της αύξησης της ήδη υπέρμετρης φορολόγησης των υπηκόων του, με αποτέλεσμα την ακύρωση σχετικής απόφασης του επάρχου του Φλωρέντιου. Στη συνέχεια, ανέλαβε ο ίδιος την πλήρη διαχείριση των οικονομικών μιας επαρχίας (της Βελγικής Β'), με σκοπό να δείξει οτι η φορολογική ελάφρυνση των υπηκόων μπορούσε να οδηγήσει σε επιτυχέστερη συλλογή φόρων. Ταυτόχρονα όμως, η επιλογή του να διαμένει σε μια απομακρυσμένη επαρχία μακριά από το αυτοκρατορικό κέντρο στην πόλη Τρεβήροι (Τρίερ) και να ενισχύσει τους δεσμούς του με την τοπική αριστοκρατία, είναι ένδειξη οτι από τότε σχεδίαζε εξέγερση.[11]

Τα επόμενα δύο χρόνια, η θέση του Ιουλιανού ισχυροποιήθηκε ακόμη περισσότερο, με νίκες εναντίων των Φράγκων και των Αλαμανών. Η ισχυροποίηση της εικόνας του στο στρατό άρχισε πια να ανησυχεί τον Αύγουστο Κωνστάντιο, ο οποίος έστειλε στον Ιουλιανό νέους συμβούλους, στην πραγματικότητα έμπιστους πράκτορές του διαβόητους για τη σκληρότητα και τις ραδιουργίες τους, προκειμένου να διερευνήσουν τις προθέσεις του Ιουλιανού.[12]
Αύγουστος (360-363)

Το 360 κλήθηκε από τον Κωνστάντιο να στείλει μέρος του στρατού του στην Ανατολή, για να συμμετάσχει σε εκστρατεία εναντίον των Περσών. Στο άκουσμα αυτής της είδησης ή, κατά τους περισσότερους ιστορικούς,[13] με υποκίνηση του ίδιου του Ιουλιανού, το στράτευμα επαναστάτησε εναντίον του Κωνσταντίου και ανακήρυξε τον Ιουλιανό Αύγουστο στο Παρίσι, τον Φεβρουάριο του 360. Αρχικά, ο Ιουλιανός έστειλε γράμματα στον Κωνστάντιο ζητώντας του αναγνώριση του νέου τίτλου του. Ο Κωνστάντιος δεν δέχτηκε αλλά δεν μπορούσε να κινηθεί εναντίον του, καθώς ο πόλεμος με τους Πέρσες συνεχιζόταν. Όλο το 360 πέρασε με τον Ιουλιανό να πραγματοποιεί επιχειρήσεις εναντίον των Φράγκων και των Αλαμανών και να προετοιμάζεται για εισβολή στην επικράτεια του Κωνστάντιου. Τέλος, την άνοιξη του 361 πέρασε αιφνιδιαστικά στην παραδουνάβια περιοχή και κατέλαβε το Σίρμιο, ήδη όμως ο Κωνστάντιος βάδιζε εναντίον του για την τελική σύγκρουση αλλά δεν πρόλαβε γιατί πέθανε στην Ταρσό της Κιλικίας στις 3 Νοεμβρίου 361.[14] Μάλιστα, λίγο πριν πεθάνει, ονόμασε τον Ιουλιανό διάδοχό του και αποφεύχθηκε ο εμφύλιος πόλεμος.[15]

Ο Ιουλιανός ήταν πολύ επηρεασμένος από την κλασική Παιδεία, και τον ενοχλούσε η ραγδαία εξάπλωση του Χριστιανισμού,[16] τον οποίο θεωρούσε ασύμβατο με την Ελληνική Φιλοσοφία και εν γένει τον Ελληνικό Πολιτισμό ("Ημίν ανήκουσιν η ευγλωττία και αι τέχναι της Ελλάδος και η των Θεών αυτής λατρεία, υμέτερος δε κλήρος εστί η αμάθεια και η αγροικία και ουδέν πλέον. Αύτη εστίν η σοφία υμών"). Από θρησκευτικής άποψης δε, επιθυμούσε την επιστροφή της Ρωμαϊκής Αυτοκρατορίας στην Εθνική θρησκεία (την οποία οι χριστιανοί κατηγορούσαν ως "ειδωλολατρία", γι αυτό και προσέδωσαν στον Ιουλιανό επίθετα όπως "Παραβάτης", "Ειδωλιανός", "Αδωναίος", "Καυσίταυρος", "Αποστάτης" και "Πισαίος"). Σύμφωνα με τον Cousin, ολόκληρος ο κόσμος της αρχαίας ελληνικής φιλοσοφίας τερματίσθηκε ουσιαστικά με τον θάνατο του Ιουλιανού.[17] Όμως, πολλοί σύγχρονοι ιστορικοί θεωρούν τον Ιουλιανό ως ένα από τους ικανότερους αυτοκράτορες σε όλη την ιστορία της Ρωμαϊκής Αυτοκρατορίας, παρόλο που ουσιαστικά την κυβέρνησε επί μόλις δύο χρόνια.

Αλλά ούτε και ο ασκητικός τρόπος ζωής του Ιουλιανού και η εμφάνισή του ήταν αγαπητά στους υπηκόους του, οι οποίοι είχαν συνηθίσει στην ιδέα του παντοδύναμου αυταρχικού μονάρχη που έπρεπε να στέκεται πολύ ψηλότερα από τους κοινούς θνητούς. Ούτε βοήθησε τη δημοτικότητά του η προσωπική συμμετοχή σε αιματηρές θυσίες.[18] Όπως παρατηρεί ο ιστορικός David S. Potter:

(Οι υπήκοοί του) αναζητούσαν έναν ηγέτη απομακρυσμένο από αυτούς μέσω της αυτοκρατορικής ισχύος του ο οποίος, από το ύψος του Ολύμπιου μεγαλείου του, θα έδειχνε ενδιαφέρον για τα προβλήματά τους και τις επιθυμίες τους (...) Έπρεπε να ενδιαφέρεται για ότι ενδιέφερε τους υπηκόους του και να του αποδίδεται ταυτόχρονα ο ανάλογος σεβασμός. Δεν θεωρούσαν σωστό ένας αυτοκράτορας να σηκώνεται από τη θέση του για να συγχαρεί προσωπικά έναν ρήτορα, όπως έκανε κάποια φορά με τον Λιβάνιο, ούτε να περιφρονεί τις αρματοδρομίες.[19]

Με σκοπό την προετοιμασία του στρατού για την επερχόμενη εκστρατεία εναντίον των Περσών, ο Ιουλιανός πέρασε τον χειμώνα του 361-362 στην Αντιόχεια, όπου και συνάντησε σοβαρά προβλήματα. Όταν προσπάθησε να αναβιώσει τη λατρεία τη σχετική με την αρχαία μαντική πηγή της Κασταλίας στο ναό του Απόλλωνα στο προάστειο Δάφνη, οι ιερείς γνωμοδότησαν οτι τα λείψανα του χριστιανού μάρτυρα Βαβύλα απέτρεπαν την εμφάνιση του θεού. Τότε ο Ιουλιανός διέπραξε το μεγάλο σφάλμα να διατάξει την απομάκρυνση των λειψάνων από το χώρο του ιερού, με αποτέλεσμα αυτή να συνοδευτεί από μεγάλη πομπή πιστών χριστιανών. Λίγο αργότερα, ο ναός του Απόλλωνα καταστράφηκε από φωτιά και ο Ιουλιανός, ρίχνοντας βιαστικά την ευθύνη στους χριστιανούς, διέταξε σοβαρές ανακρίσεις. Επίσης, έκλεισε τη μεγαλύτερη εκκλησία της πόλης, πριν οι ανακρίσεις αποδείξουν οτι η πυρκαγιά ήταν προϊόν ατυχήματος.[20]

Οι σχέσεις του με τους Αντιοχείς χειροτέρεψαν ακόμη περισσότερο μετά από μια σοβαρή έλλειψη τροφίμων. Ο Ιουλιανός προσπάθησε να σταθεροποιήσει την τιμή του σιταριού και να εισαγάγει από την Αύγυπτο. Τότε οι παραγωγοί αρνήθηκαν να πουλήσουν το δικό τους, υποστηρίζοντας οτι η συγκομιδή ήταν κακή και πως ήταν λοιπόν δίκαιο να αποζημιωθούν με υψηλότερες τιμές για το προϊόν τους. Ο Ιουλιανός τους κατηγόρησε για πρακτικές ανύψωσης τιμών και τους εξανάγκασε να πουλήσουν. Τμήματα των επιστολών του Λιβανίου[21][22] υποδεικνύουν οτι και οι δύο πλευρές είχαν εν μέρει δίκιο ενώ ο Αμμιανός Μαρκελλίνος κατηγορεί τον Ιουλιανό για απλή δίψα για δημοσιότητα.[23][20]

Το 363, ο Ιουλιανός εισέβαλε στο περσικό κράτος, στο οποίο βασίλευε ο Σαπώρης Β', επικεφαλής ισχυρότατου εκστρατευτικού σώματος, ενώ έστειλε τον συγγενή του Προκόπιο επικεφαλής στρατού για να εισβάλλει κυκλωτικά από τα βόρεια. Γενικά η εκστρατεία αυτή έχει δεχτεί πολύ έντονη κριτική από τους σύγχρονους ιστορικούς, όχι μόνο γιατί θα μπορούσε να αποφευχθεί ο πόλεμος (ο Ιουλιανός απέπεμψε δημόσια την ειρηνευτική πρεσβεία των Περσών) αλλά και γιατί από την αρχή φαινόταν υπερβολικά φιλόδοξη και επικίνδυνη.[24] Πράγματι, παρά τις αρχικές επιτυχίες, το επιχείρημα αποδείχθηκε καταστροφικό για τον ρωμαϊκό στρατό που αντιμετώπισε μεγάλα επισιτιστικά προβλήματα και τη συνεχή παρενόχληση των περσικών δυνάμεων. Η στρατιά του Προκοπίου δεν εμφανίστηκε ποτέ στο εχθρικό έδαφος. Καθώς ο στρατός του Ιουλιανού εισχωρούσε όλο και περισσότερο στο εσωτερικό της περσικής Μεσοποταμίας, οι Πέρσες άνοιξαν τα αρδευτικά φράγματα πλημυρρίζοντας τη χώρα. Φτάνοντας εμπρός στην περσική πρωτεύουσα Κτησιφώντα, ο Ιουλιανός διαπίστωσε πως δεν διέθετε τον εξοπλισμό για την εκπολιόρκηση της πόλης. Τότε πήρε την απόφαση της επιστροφής και, καθώς η διαδρομή πίσω του ήταν πλημυρρισμένη, αναγκάστηκε να ακολουθήσε πορεία προς βόρεια, κατά μήκος του ποταμού Τίγρη. Η πορεία αυτή, μέσα στην εχθρική χώρα, κάτω από ανυπόφορο καύσωνα και υπό τη συνεχή παρενόχληση ενός εχθρού που απέφευγε την κατά μέτωπο σύγκρουση, ήταν εξαιρετικά προβληματική και όλα έδειχναν οτι ο ρωμαϊκός στρατός είχε πιαστεί σε θανάσιμη παγίδα. Οι Πέρσες γνώριζαν πως όχι μόνο ήταν επικίνδυνο να ριψοκινδυνεύσουν μια κατά μέτωπο σύγκρουση αλλά και οτι αυτό δεν ήταν αναγκαίο, καθώς το μόνο που χρειαζόταν ήταν να επιβραδύνουν την υποχώρηση των Ρωμαίων. Κάτω από αυτές τις συνθήκες, στις 26 Ιουνίου 363, σε αψιμαχία με τους Πέρσες, ο Ιουλιανός χτυπήθηκε πισώπλατα από δόρυ και πέθανε μετά από λίγες ώρες στη σκηνή του, σε ηλικία 31 ετών. Παρ' όλη τη μετέπειτα χριστιανική παράδοση οτι χτυπήθηκε από άγιο και τις κατηγορίες των εθνικών, δεν φαίνεται να αληθεύει η εκδοχή της δολοφονίας από δικό του στρατιώτη.[25] Ο Λιβάνιος, 14 χρόνια μετά το γεγονός, ανέφερε οτι το δόρυ εκτοξεύτηκε από Άραβα ενώ σε κείμενο του Φιλοστόργιου αναφέρεται η γνωμάτευση του γιατρού του Ιουλιανού Ορειβάσιου ο οποίος, εξετάζοντας τη θανάσιμη πληγή, είχε διαπιστώσει πως προήλθε από ακόντιο που χρησιμοποιούσαν οι Άραβες σύμμαχοι των Περσών.[26]

Ο διάδοχός του Ιοβιανός, για να περισώσει το εκστρατευτικό σώμα από τη δεινή θέση στην οποία βρισκόταν, συνθηκολόγησε με τους Πέρσες παραχωρώντας τους πέντε εξαιρετικά σημαντικές, από στρατιωτικής άποψης, συνοριακές επαρχίες καθώς και ισχυρά φρούρια της Μεσοποταμίας όπως η Νίσιβις και τα Σίνγκαρα.[25] Η συνθήκη δεν ήταν απλώς μια επαναφορά στην προ Διοκλητιανού εποχή αλλά δημιούργησε το εφαλτήριο για τις μετέπειτα εισβολές των Περσών στο ρωμαϊκό έδαφος.[27]
οι κρητικες για το ονομα του ειναι παρα πολλες κυριος απο χριστιανους πολλα ακουγοντε οτι ηταν θεοκρατης δειλος σφαγεας φανατικος παγανιστης κτλ

ας τα διαψευσουμε ενα ενα

πρωτον το περι φανατικου παγανισμου δεν υσχυει καθως ο ιδιος δεχωταν στον κυκλο του ατομα υψηλης διανοησης και απο τον χριστιανισμο ας θυμησουμε οτι και ο ιδιος γνωρισε το χριστιανισμο εξαρχης αλλα η κοντρες και η πολιτικες των χριστιανων του προκαλεσαν αποστροφη παραταυτα δεν κρατησε κανενα μισος για τους χριστιανους αν και ο ιδιος ειχε προτημησει την αρχαια λατρεια ειχε πολλους χριστιανους στρατηγους και δοιηκητες στους κυκλους του

δευτερον τα περι δειλιας αλλο ενα αστειο ψεμα καθως ο ιουλιανος πολεμουσε παντα στην πρωτη γραμμη της μαχης και μαλιστα η γεναιοτητα του ιδιου εμψυχωνε το στρατο ακομα και στην τελευτεα του μαχη σταθηκε γεναιος και πολεμησε μεχρι το τελος

τριτον το σφαγεας αυτο διαψευδετε ευκολα καθως υπαρχουν παμπολα στοιχεια για το συγκεκριμενο ζητημα ενα απο αυτα ηταν στην αντιοχεια που ηταν μια πολη αμοιγος χριστιανικη κοροιδευαν τον ιουλιανο αποκαλοντας τον με διαφορα επιθετα οπως <<αδωνινος>> <<ειδολινος>> <<ρητορικος τυφλοποντικας>>(λογο τικ που ειχε και ανοιγοκλεινε τα ματια καθως μιλουσε) και αλλα πολλα ενω οι στρατιωτες ζητουσαν το αιμα των χριστιανων που ειρωνευονταν(ιδιος οι πελτουζανοι γερμανοι οπως περιγραφει ο σαλουτιος) ο ιδιος δεν εδωσε ποτε τετοια διαταγη ακομα και οταν οι φανατικοι χριστιανοι εκαψαν το ναο της δαφνης ο ιουλιανος δεν διεταξε καμια διαταγη για διωγμους και σφαγες

ιουλιανος και εβραιοι: στα πλαισια της ανεξιθρησκειας ο ιουλιανος ειχε επειτρεψει στους εβραιους να ασκουν ελευθερα τη λατρεια τους και μεσα στην ιερη τους πολη ειχε μαλιστα σχεδιασει ενα προγραμμα ανοικοδομησης του ναου του σολομοντα και επετρεψε επισης στους εβραιους να επισκεπτονται την πολη τους δικαιωμα που τους ειχε αφαιρεσει ο χριστιανος προκατοχος του κωσταντιος

στο θεμα περι θεοκρατιας ο ιουλιανος ηταν καθετος οπως ο ιδιος γραφει στο ημερολογιο του δεν ηθελε ποτε να παιξει το ρολο του θεικου μοναρχη(divius julius) ηθελε οι ανθρωποι να τον αγαπησουν για τα εργα του και οχι απο φοβο

ιουλιανος και ελλαδα: ο ιουλιανος ηταν μισος ελλην(απο τη μερια της μητερας του) και αγαπουσε πολυ την ελληνικη φιλοσοφια παιδεια και γραμματα γι αυτο και τον ενοχλουσε η ανοδος του χριστιανισμου(μιας θρησκειας που δεν συνδεοταν καθολου με τα πατρωα και περιφρονουσε την παραδοση) αγαπημενα του βιβλια ηταν τα βιβλια του πλατωνα οπως επισης και τα βιβλια του ξενοφωντα ο ιδιος εγραψε αποθεματα για την ελληνικοτητα της μακεδονιας και για την αθηνα που τη θεωρουσε την καλυτερη πολη του κοσμου εκει μαλιστα ειχε πει ο ιδιος οτι ειχε ζησει σε μια προηγουμενη ζωη εκει μαλιστα μυηθηκε στα μεγαλα ελευσινια μυστηρια απο τον ιεροφαντη πρισκο

εν κατακλειδι με αυτα τα στοιχεια μπορουμε να συμπερανουμε ποιος ηταν ο ιουλιανος και ποια τα εργα του